Switchgrass for Co-generation Fuel Feasibility
-Chris Ferland
TABLE OF CONTENTS

SWITCHGRASS FEASIBILITY

SWITCHGRASS INFORMATION.........................1

SWITCHGRASS ECONOMICS.............................2

BUDGET..................................................................3

BREAKEVEN TABLE............................................5

TOTAL COST TABLE WITH TRANSPORTATION.............6

TEST PLOT AVERAGES................................................8

SUMMARY......................................................9


Switchgrass Information:
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a native grass species to much of the USA. It has recently shown great potential for use in production of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass (Lynd et al., 1991). Work in Alabama demonstrated very high dry matter yields can be achieved with Switchgrass (Maposse, et al., 1995) in the Southeastern USA. Therefore, this region is thought to be an excellent choice for development of a Switchgrass cropping system where farmers can produce the grass for either biomass or forage. Another report has shown success with selection and breeding to develop high yielding germplasm from adapted varieties and ecotypes of Switchgrass (Moser and Vogel, 1995). At present, however, there is little plant breeding effort within the southeast region. In this proposal, we plan to initiate a breeding program whose goal is development of high yielding, adapted varieties for use in the Southeastern USA. We will also conduct a multi-location testing program for Switchgrass, compare its biomass production to other adapted warm-season grass species such as bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.), bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge.), and elephantgrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach.), and initiate studies on some best management practices for growing the crop for biomass, forage, and seed production.

Except for the far western states, Switchgrass occurs naturally throughout the contiguous USA (Moser and Vogel, 1995). Although possessing rhizomes, Switchgrass is an upright growing species capable of producing high dry matter yields. Traditionally, Switchgrass is used as a forage and conservation crop. Recently, its use in biofuel production of ethanol has been proposed (Lynd et al. 1991). When combining its uses of forage, conservation, and biofuel production, farming systems based on Switchgrass could become an economic boon for farmers interested in sustainable and profitable farming enterprises.

Switchgrass varieties and ecotypes are classified as either lowland or upland types (Moser and Vogel, 1995). Lowland types occur in river bottom areas, are tall and robust, possess a bunch-type growth habit, and are tetraploids (2n=36). Upland types are shorter and finer, possess long rhizomes which allow them to spread more, and are either hexaploids or octoploids (2n=54, 72).

In a six year study in Alabama, the lowland variety Alamo was found to average 24.5 Mg ha-1 dry matter yield (Maposse et al., 1995) This was 42% more dry matter than another lowland type, Kanlow, but also 135% higher than the average of the six upland varieties in the trial ('Blackwell', 'Cave-in-Rock', Kansas Native, 'Pathfinder', 'Summer', and 'Trailblazer'). This amount of dry matter production would be considered much higher than that which could be achieved with other warm-season grasses used in the Southeastern USA.

Although a very high yielding plant once established, Switchgrass stands planted from seed are usually very weak and early management practices of weed and insect control are a must to insure early producing swards (Moser and Vogel, 1995). Therefore, a great deal of research has centered on the best management systems for initially establishing and managing stands of Switchgrass.


Switchgrass Economics

Using inputs advised by the Crop and Soil Sciences department at the University of Georgia an enterprise budget was constructed for Switchgrass production. The University has three test plots growing Switchgrass and have tested the best possible combinations of methods and ingredients to receive the best yields. These results allow the budget to be realistic.

The variable cost associated with growing Switchgrass amounted to approximately $260 per acre. The fixed cost, including machinery cost for the enterprise, amounted to $82 per acre. Adding a return to management at 5% of the variable cost and the pre-harvest interest of the same amount, the total cost per acre is $395. (Refer to budget in appendix)

The test plot yielded from 2 to 8 tons per acre, so for this study an average yield of 6 tons per acre was chosen. The breakeven price needed for various tons appears in the chart below
Total Variable CostPer Acre Total Fixed CostPer Acre Total CostPer Acre Price PerGallon toCoverSwitchgrass CostAlone Per Acre
Tons Per Acre
2 $131.00 $66.50 $197.50 $2.47
3 $87.33 $44.33 $131.67 $1.65
4 $65.50 $33.25 $98.75 $1.23
5 $52.40 $26.60 $79.00 $0.99
6 $43.67 $22.17 $65.83 $0.82
7 $37.43 $19.00 $56.43 $0.71
8 $32.75 $16.63 $49.38 $0.62
9 $29.11 $14.78 $43.89 $0.55
10
$26.20 $13.30 $39.50 $0.49


This table indicates that even with 10 tons per acre the total cost for the farmer to grow Switchgrass is around $40 per ton. The average tons per acre based off all known test plots were 6 tons. Given this, the farmers will need to earn $66 per ton to cover the costs.

Each ton of Switchgrass is assumed to produce 80 gallons of ethanol. Using the above cost for growing Switchgrass, one can establish the ethanol price necessary to cover the cost of Switchgrass as an input. When an acre yields 6 tons of Switchgrass, the minimum price of ethanol to cover Switchgrass is $.82.


This chart simply shows that to cover the Switchgrass cost the ethanol price per gallon has to be at the above price. This does not include any of the other costs needed in producing ethanol.

One problem with Switchgrass is the transportation and shrinkage factor. Presently little testing has been done on what the actually shrink amount in the grass may be. Researchers suggest anywhere from 10% to 40% basing this off forage shrinkage rates. So, when the shrink factor and transportation are added to the equation for the average yield of 6 tons at 30% shrinkage the breakeven become $81.25. (Refer to chart in appendix)

University of Georgia Research Programs:

The University of Georgia has for many years conducted, especially in conjunction with the USDA, a forage grass and legume breeding project for the Southeast and has released several commercially successful varieties during that time. The strengths of these breeding efforts are 1) scientists and technical staff experienced in development, release, and dissemination of new grass and legume varieties, 2) availability of a network of branch stations which allows selection and testing of germplasms over a range of climates and soil physiographic regions, 3) access to animals during selection and testing to insure collection of information on pasture dependability and livestock performance, and 4) a region where "native" Switchgrass ecotypes can be collected.




Switchgrass (based off Dr. Joe Bouton and Dr. Carl Hoveland)

Prepared by John C. McKissick, Bill Givan and Chris Ferland

Ext. Ag. Econ. Dept., Univ. of Ga.

2001

Switchgrass

(Total Cost Budget)

NUMBER OF ACRES 1.00
BEST
OPT.
MEDIAN
PESS.
WORST
YIELD (TONS)
9.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
SELLING PRICE ($/TON)
90.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
ITEM UNIT UNITS

PER ACRE

TOTAL

QUANTITY

UNIT

PRICE

TOTAL

AMOUNT

VARIABLE COSTS: (units) ($/unit) ($)
LIME TON 0.50 1 24.00 12
FERTILIZER:
NITROGEN LB. 200.00 200 0.24 48
PHOSPHATE LB. 60.00 60 0.25 15
POTASH LB 125.00 125 0.13 16
HERBICIDES ACRE 1.00 1 7.00 7
MACHINERY
FUEL GAL 13.00 13 0.85 11
REPAIRS & MAINT. ACRE 1.00 1 32.00 32
TWINE BALE 0.13 0 20.00 3
LAND RENTAL ACRE 1.00 1 20.00 20
LABOR HRS 10.00 10 8.00 80
OTHER $ 0.00 0 0.00 0
INTEREST ON OP. CAP. $ 241 9% 22
TOTAL VARIABLE COST 263

Fixed Cost:(Press Button for Annual Cost)
Direct Fixed Cost
Acre
1
81.59
82
Pre-Harvest
$
263
0.05
13
Management
$
263
0.00
0
Land
Acre
1
0.00
0
Total Fixed Cost
95

EXPECTED BREAKEVEN TABLE
ITEM TOTAL AMOUNT $ / TON $/Acre
VARIABLE COST 263 44.06 262.58
DIRECT FIXED COST 82 13.69 81.59
OVERHEAD 13 2.20 13.13
MANAGEMENT 0 0.00 0.00
LAND 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COST 357 59.95 357.30
EXPECTED RETURN TABLE

1 ACRE

EXP. YIELD TOTAL YIELD EXP. PRICE TOTAL RETURN
(Tons/Acre) (tons) ($/ton) ($)
5.96 5.96 59.60 355

RISK RATED RETURNS OVER TOTAL COST
Net return levels (TOP ROW);
The chances of obtaining this level or more (MIDDLE ROW); and
The chances of obtaining this level or less (BOTTOM ROW).
Optimistic Expected Pessimistic
Returns($)
214
138
61
-15
-97
-179
-260
Chances
6%
16%
32%
51%
Chances 49%
30%
16%
7%
CHANCE FOR PROFIT
47%
BASE BUDGETED NET REVENUE
-10
Total Cost with Transportation
Percent Shrink
Ton Per Acre
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30% 35% 40%
2
$190.58
$199.65
$208.73
$217.80
$226.88
$235.95 $245.03 $254.10
3
$128.10
$134.20
$140.30
$146.40
$152.50
$158.60 $164.70 $170.80
4
$96.86
$101.48
$85.56
$110.70
$115.31 $119.93 $124.54 $129.15
5
$78.12
$81.84
$85.56
$89.28
$93.00 $96.72 $100.44 $104.16
6
$65.63
$68.75
$71.88
$75.00
$78.13 $81.25 $84.38 $87.50
7
$56.70
$59.40
$62.10
$64.80
$67.50 $70.20 $72.90 $75.60
8
$50.01
$52.39
$54.77
$57.15
$59.53 $61.91 $64.29 $66.68
9
$44.80
$46.93
$49.07
$51.20
$53.33 $55.47 $57.60 $59.73
10
$40.64
$42.57
$44.51
$46.44
$48.38 $50.31 $52.25 $54.18
Summary
Georgia can compete in Switchgrass production based on yield alone, but the inputs used to achieve these results are higher than other locations. Iowa?s Switchgrass grows wild on Conservation Reserve Program land and yields range from 2 to 6 tons per acre. Their land was already in the CRP prior to any establishment of Switchgrass use as a co-generation fuel.

The Sheraton Valley RCD created the Switchgrass program in conjunction with the Farm Service Agency (FSA). Each state?s CRP can differ depending on FSA and state officials.

The harvesting of Iowa?s Switchgrass occurs by the electric companies. Using adapted John Deere forage harvest equipment. Harvesting cannot occur within 100 feet of water. A reduction of 25% in CRP payments occurs with any income made off the land. Iowa?s program is still in the pilot stage and nothing has been finalized.

Even though Switchgrass is an interesting idea, for Georgia to contemplate the growing and use of Switchgrass a higher return to farmers needs to occur. Breakevens place Switchgrass in the similar category as high-value forage crops.